Manhattan Declaration: A Call of Christian Conscience . . . Say What?

By Kit-Bacon Gressitt

On November 20, a group of self-described “prominent Christian clergy, ministry leaders and scholars” held a press conference to announce their new manifesto, the “Manhattan Declaration: A Call of Christian Conscience.”

The manifesto was written by Chuck Colson, founder of Prison Fellowship Ministries and one of the folks convicted of misbehavior related to the Watergate caper; Dr. Robert George, on leave from Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and National Organization for Marriage board chairman, and Dr. Timothy George, dean of Beeson Divinity School at Samford University.

Why did the fellows write the thing? Well, this is interesting. When Colson appeared on former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee’s Fox News show to promote the declaration, Huckabee asked a similar question: “Why do we need something that sort of defines the line in the sand for people of Christendom?”

Colson replied, “Everybody blames the Christians for starting the culture wars. That’s not true, Governor. What really happened is the liberals started to say we are going to take away rights which we’ve had since the founding of this nation, rights which are intrinsic to what makes a good society and a just society, rights which are vital to our Christian faith.”

Yikes. This is also interesting because I’m a liberal, but if I were trying to take away Christians’ rights, none of my siblings would speak to me. Hmmm.

Colson went on to say: “We released a document which is remarkable because it is signed by 150 leaders from the Orthodox church, the Roman Catholic Church and from leaders of the evangelical world, all of us saying three things: We want to affirm the sanctity of human life. … The second thing is the sanctity of the family because the family is the basic building block of any good society historically, and the third thing is, if you continue to assault the family, continue to assault life, continue to assault our liberties, we will ungrudgingly render to Caesar what is Caesar’s, but under no circumstances render to Caesar what is God’s.”

At first I wasn’t sure what Colson was talking about, and it occurred to me that garnering the support of only 150 of the thousands of Christian leaders in the country really isn’t worth a press conference.

But then Huckabee, who was practically squirming out of his seat (was it excitement or an enlarged prostate?), compared the document to one of Christianity’s more momentous — and divisive — occasions: “I can’t remember of anything this significant happening in my lifetime! In fact I’m thinking the posting of the 95 theses on the door at Wittenberg by Martin Luther may be the equivalent, where the community of faith says, ‘This is it. We make a stand.’ This is a bold stand, but what’s unique about this [is] Catholics, Evangelicals, Orthodox coming together. They normally can’t get together for a cup of coffee!”

It’s nice to know Huckabee has a sense of humor, but if you actually read the document, you realize that Colson’s language in the interview is code. What the declaration actually says is that his group is anti-abortion and anti-same-sex marriage (Colson refers to homosexuals as “people with that disorder”), and they want to be able to say and do whatever they believe is in keeping with their faith, regardless of the law and the consequences — although they indicate they are willing to suffer the consequences of their actions if there are any. This is old news, but they are darn adamant: “We will not comply with any edict that purports to compel our institutions to participate in abortions, embryo-destructive research, assisted suicide and euthanasia, or any other anti-life act; nor will we bend to any rule purporting to force us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriage or the equivalent, or refrain from proclaiming the truth, as we know it, about morality and immorality and marriage and the family.”

Yep, old news — and my understanding of the U.S. Constitution is that these folks already have the rights they are demanding and no one’s trying to take them away. Of course, if you don’t want to perform an abortion or dispense birth control, it would be wise not to accept a job with those responsibilities. And if you own commercial property that is rented to the public for special events such as weddings, expect to be held to the same standards as any other commercial property owner — even if you are a church. But other than that, you can practice your faith as you see fit and you can certainly declare most anything you want.

So, why the 4,700-word prayer for deliverance from evil’s with which they are not afflicted — a preemptive attack, paranoia, everyone else is holding press conferences for non-news idiocy, so why not?

I dunno, but it is kind of interesting, although I would never have heard of the manifesto had I not been on the email lists of several extremist groups that keep me much better informed than is comfortable. As of one week post-press conference, a Google News search of the declaration produced less than 200 hits, but a Web search produced 697,000. And the declaration’s promoters, who are asking “believers and non-believers” to lend their names to the electronic document, have managed to reel in 180,000 signatures — not stupendous, but not bad. However, I am embarrassed to admit that one of the signatures is mine — using the pseudonym “Ido Notagree.” I wonder if they’ll condemn me to hell for this? Or maybe they’ll take a kinder approach and just pray for my wanton soul, which would be okay, as I figure I can use all the prayers I can get. I don’t care whose invisible friend hears them.

Love,
K-B

The Preamble and the Declaration are below, but beware the Preamble: The fellows’ take on Christianity’s history is an adept whitewashing of the church and its faithfuls’ atrocities, tyrannies, denials of religious liberty to non-Christians and the wrong kind of Christians, and rejections of the sanctity of life — with a single-phrase nod: “While fully acknowledging the imperfections and shortcomings of Christian institutions and communities in all ages…” Regardless, you might consider checking out the whole enchilada.

Preamble

Christians are heirs of a 2,000-year tradition of proclaiming God’s word, seeking justice in our societies, resisting tyranny, and reaching out with compassion to the poor, oppressed and suffering.

While fully acknowledging the imperfections and shortcomings of Christian institutions and communities in all ages, we claim the heritage of those Christians who defended innocent life by rescuing discarded babies from trash heaps in Roman cities and publicly denouncing the Empire’s sanctioning of infanticide. We remember with reverence those believers who sacrificed their lives by remaining in Roman cities to tend the sick and dying during the plagues, and who died bravely in the coliseums rather than deny their Lord.

After the barbarian tribes overran Europe, Christian monasteries preserved not only the Bible but also the literature and art of Western culture. It was Christians who combated the evil of slavery: Papal edicts in the 16th and 17th centuries decried the practice of slavery and first excommunicated anyone involved in the slave trade; evangelical Christians in England, led by John Wesley and William Wilberforce, put an end to the slave trade in that country. Christians under Wilberforce’s leadership also formed hundreds of societies for helping the poor, the imprisoned, and child laborers chained to machines.

In Europe, Christians challenged the divine claims of kings and successfully fought to establish the rule of law and balance of governmental powers, which made modern democracy possible. And in America, Christian women stood at the vanguard of the suffrage movement. The great civil rights crusades of the 1950s and 60s were led by Christians claiming the Scriptures and asserting the glory of the image of God in every human being regardless of race, religion, age or class.

This same devotion to human dignity has led Christians in the last decade to work to end the dehumanizing scourge of human trafficking and sexual slavery, bring compassionate care to AIDS sufferers in Africa, and assist in a myriad of other human rights causes – from providing clean water in developing nations to providing homes for tens of thousands of children orphaned by war, disease and gender discrimination.

Like those who have gone before us in the faith, Christians today are called to proclaim the Gospel of costly grace, to protect the intrinsic dignity of the human person and to stand for the common good. In being true to its own calling, the call to discipleship, the church through service to others can make a profound contribution to the public good.

Declaration

We, as Orthodox, Catholic, and Evangelical Christians, have gathered, beginning in New York on September 28, 2009, to make the following declaration, which we sign as individuals, not on behalf of our organizations, but speaking to and from our communities. We act together in obedience to the one true God, the triune God of holiness and love, who has laid total claim on our lives and by that claim calls us with believers in all ages and all nations to seek and defend the good of all who bear his image. We set forth this declaration in light of the truth that is grounded in Holy Scripture, in natural human reason (which is itself, in our view, the gift of a beneficent God), and in the very nature of the human person. We call upon all people of goodwill, believers and non-believers alike, to consider carefully and reflect critically on the issues we here address as we, with St. Paul, commend this appeal to everyone’s conscience in the sight of God.

While the whole scope of Christian moral concern, including a special concern for the poor and vulnerable, claims our attention, we are especially troubled that in our nation today the lives of the unborn, the disabled, and the elderly are severely threatened; that the institution of marriage, already buffeted by promiscuity, infidelity and divorce, is in jeopardy of being redefined to accommodate fashionable ideologies; that freedom of religion and the rights of conscience are gravely jeopardized by those who would use the instruments of coercion to compel persons of faith to compromise their deepest convictions.

Because the sanctity of human life, the dignity of marriage as a union of husband and wife, and the freedom of conscience and religion are foundational principles of justice and the common good, we are compelled by our Christian faith to speak and act in their defense. In this declaration we affirm: 1) the profound, inherent, and equal dignity of every human being as a creature fashioned in the very image of God, possessing inherent rights of equal dignity and life; 2) marriage as a conjugal union of man and woman, ordained by God from the creation, and historically understood by believers and non-believers alike, to be the most basic institution in society and; 3) religious liberty, which is grounded in the character of God, the example of Christ, and the inherent freedom and dignity of human beings created in the divine image.

We are Christians who have joined together across historic lines of ecclesial differences to affirm our right — and, more importantly, to embrace our obligation — to speak and act in defense of these truths. We pledge to each other, and to our fellow believers, that no power on earth, be it cultural or political, will intimidate us into silence or acquiescence. It is our duty to proclaim the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in its fullness, both in season and out of season. May God help us not to fail in that duty.

Read more here.

Comments (12)

Peter FodorNovember 29th, 2009 at 4:27 am

I have a hard time reading this!

“Christians are heirs of a 2,000-year tradition of proclaiming God’s word, seeking justice in our societies, resisting tyranny, and reaching out with compassion to the poor, oppressed and suffering”.

There are other faiths that, with much less, do much more – including some Moslem sects! That is in part why Christianity is losing followers.

“Sacrificed their lives ….. rather than deny their Lord.”

What are the Moslems of Palastine, Iraq and Jews doing now, too “…rather than deny(ing) their Lord” — not that I approve!

I could write similar retorts to virtually every sentence in both the declaration and preamble. I wish Christians (the wealthiest segment of the world’s society) would stop trying to be “holier then thou” and try to really help the World’s poor and sick and be just and fair to those whose ideas differ from theirs.

Sadly humans (including those claiming to be and are considered to be intellectuals) justify their behavior using blind faith rather then hard and realistic logic!

KimNovember 29th, 2009 at 7:56 am

I guess my big question here is this – does rolling out these fellow’s 95 feces, oops, I mean theses, on FOX news constitute a press conference? My apologies to you K-B …. it is much to early to read and digest all of the “manifesto.” This feces (darn – did it again) theses requires a big, big glass of wine to make it more palatable.

RichardNovember 29th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

When I look at the name…”Manhattan Declaration,” I can’t help but think of the “Manhattan Project.”… Wasn’t that the name of something that ended up destroying a couple of cities? Now, we have a “Manhattan” that wants to destroy the separation of church and state. There is not much that scares me at this time of my life. … These folks scare me.

Attack on religious freedom?? We not only allow people to dance and kiss snakes, but, we don’t tax their buildings or their income. I wonder if most secular writers would like to have folks buy their books for a fee that was called a “gift” and not have to deal with the tax man.

Thanks for the heads up on this one.

MaryNovember 29th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

My IMMEDIATE reaction is that “these christians” are once again behaving as wolves and wrapping themselves in the clothing of innocent lambs; once again preaching intolerance under the guise of humility, responsibility, and grace filled actions; they are selling this agenda of 1.opposing different lifestyles, 2.anti-choice and 3.maintaining religious liberty by building on- and therefore asserting that these are the same as presently accepted human rights and equalities — such as civil rights and AIDS assistance etc. Whereas — whew — it is opposite, perhaps with exception of abortion rights… (IF THEY TRULY BELIEVE IT IS THE KILLING OF A COMPLETE HUMAN LIFE . 1) the profound, inherent, and equal dignity of every human being as a creature fashioned in the very image of God, possessing inherent rights of equal dignity and life;) As much as i don’t agree with anti-choice, i do understand their belief regardless of science…that’s also a debatable idea. But moving onto 2) marriage as a “conjugal union of man and woman, ordained by God from the creation, and historically understood by believers and non-believers alike, to be the most basic institution in society and…” well THIS goes against #1!!!! nothing need to be explained! and 3) religious liberty, which is grounded in the character of God, the example of Christ, and the inherent freedom and dignity of human beings created in the divine image. OK… now they are again subtley violating #1, saying that only Christianity is THE ONE TRUE RELIGION and therefore other religious freedoms need to be based on the iMAGE of their Christan god…wait- i don’t know, it’s just contradictory on too many levels and i stopped explainingmyself wellbecasue i am in a hurry and this is my knee jerk reaction.

The truth is, Christ has set beautiful examples and ideals to live our lives and christians Have participated in totally important neccessary admirable human causes and did so sincerely, but too many “causes” are misconstrued under these ideals.

JoeNovember 29th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

This is a declaration that the sanctity of institutions supersedes LOVE.

The declaration is: Above all, preserve the institution of the Church and preserve the institution of traditional marriage.

I admit I struggled many years over abortion, before coming to the conclusion that, although abortion is a matter of interest to the Church and to the State, as institutions they are both too monolithic to deal with the intensely individual human and psychological variables.

It is a personal decision to be made by the party most profoundly affected: the individual woman. Some women will make “wrong” decisions, but institutions will surely make far more wrong decisions and cause far more agony and injustice.

Certainly I agree with helping the poor and feeding the hungry, but, after all, these were the main teachings of Jesus — not helping and feeding religious institutions. His was the message of LOVE and compassion.

I view this Declaration as merely a fresh tablecloth for continuation of the same old menu.

AnonymousNovember 29th, 2009 at 5:25 pm

As always, sweeping declarations are simpistic. My thoughts are scattered but here they are: Re abortion, in nature, every seed doesn’t get a chance to sprout into a full plant. Some are cast by chance into hostile territory and don’t get the opportunity to become the plant their genes intended. As for human seeds, I believe babies do deserve the right to be born but sometimes that seed is cast into hostile territory and other factors must be taken into consideration. I believe abortion should be used only as a final resort but it should be available to women who feel they need one. The very people who resist “big” government are wanting the right to govern a very private part of a woman’s body. Should the government in all fairness make a rule about men’s testicles?

Christians seem to be taking credit for everything good that ever happened in the world. In all fairness, I’d like to hear more about the Crusades, the Jews burned alive in a locked temple in a battle with Saladin–in the name of God and Christianity, as only one of the horrors of the Crusades–and the Inquisition. Many Christians today are unaware of this part of their history. They should knowthese things happened and take responsibility for a good belief gone awry.

Re good government, Christians can’t take credit for Democracy. It was the Iriquois who developed a system for tribal governing that inspired early American leaders.

Re the pious attitude that Christianity brings good to the world–and it can and does, but so does Buddhism, Taoism etc–all other beliefs including paganism. All beliefs, including Christianity, have their strong and weak points.. Much good has been brought to the world by thinkers and doers people simply acting in the spirit of doing right and doing good whether they are Christians or not. Some bad has been brought to the world by Christians speaking their faith but acting in self interest. Christianity is no guarantee of good behavior. It is what is in a person’s mind and heart that matters.

ConnieNovember 29th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

This Manhattan Declaration is terribly offensive to me. They are cloaking their discriminatory views in the false halo of Christian compassion. These views are just ‘I’m-holier-than-you’ attempts to justify virulent discrimination against gays, and unfair restriction of women’s reproductive autonomy.

They make some very nice, compassionate points about Christian involvement in fighting historical injustices, although they are very selective in their interpretation of history. I’ll just stick with recent history, with which I am most familiar: A few in the women’s suffrage movement were Christians. A few in the civil rights movement were Christians, but they were mostly black Christian preachers reaching their audience through black Christina churches. A few Christians have been compassionate to those with AIDS, but mostly those in Africa, not those here in America because they are often homosexuals. And they do most of this “aid and comfort to the poor” primarily because it gives them an excuse to proselytize.

With regard to the insolent ‘affirmation,’ (paragraph 3 of the Declaration portion of the message): Affirmation #2 directly conflicts with and nullifies the ‘inherent rights of equal dignity and life’ contained within Affirmation #1.

KateNovember 29th, 2009 at 5:41 pm

I can’t get past the “Call of Christian Conscience” part. Sorry!

BettyNovember 29th, 2009 at 6:25 pm

Christianity not being the only religion that I don’t believe in — but rather, just being one example of an entire unexplainable (by me, at least) trend toward subservience that has preoccupied the human race since we came down out of the trees — I am not a good person to ask for an opinion about something like the Manhattan Declaration. That fact that I think it is a total waste of time is probably only what any sincere non-deist thinks about it. At least, I could hope so.

JNovember 29th, 2009 at 6:35 pm

Where to start? Needing a god (we have had so many) to require us to do good works makes no sense to me. I am particularly annoyed with the catholic church, now led by a former nazi youth who purports to tell others how to live. See, you got me stirred up…

BrettNovember 30th, 2009 at 7:57 am

Bring back the lions! Save for the evangelical Muslims. Christians track record universally is violent and atrocious. Take for example Colson’s comment they always fall back on,”the founding of this country…” Indigenous people suffered horrible injustice, continuing to this day. The bill of rights was valid for only white , male, Christians. The preamble to the “official” manifesto is so devoid of any truth, humility or room for other ideas. Sounds like a call for a new holy war. Gotta stop before I get sick.

AnonymousNovember 30th, 2009 at 8:14 am

This is very sneaky, with its tone of pseudo-intellectualism. The introduction had me nodding in assent, until I got to the phrase “fashionable ideologies.” And to use the history of the church with slavery as a positive thing, is totally ignoring the American experience, where the Bible was widely used to justify that institution. Only the Quakers can be proud of their role in abolishing slavery. The other churches just stood by.

And of course, the rest of it is slimy, especially that stuff about the “marriage culture.” To say that marriage is justified only by procreation is to ignore the reality of a large proportion of marital unions.

The number of high-status signers is terrifying. This is a powerful piece, not just a nut job.

Leave a comment

Your comment