Obama Cabinet Nominees: Where Are the Women?

By Kit-Bacon Gressitt

 

President-elect Barack Obama is naming names — well, no, someone is deftly leaking them. Regardless, given the brilliant and well-accoutered rivals, intimates and mutual admiration society members from whom he’s selecting his cabinet nominees, the country is likely to enjoy the perks and quirks of some very interesting minds.

Being of the female persuasion, I’m particularly keen on the minds of women whose names are making it up the flagpole.

Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) as Secretary of State is a nice plug to chaw: The thrill of her former presidential campaign supporters is surely matched by the horror of those who would have voted for anyone but Clinton for president had she won the primaries — even Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, who tripped through the campaign on her syntax.

Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano as Secretary of Homeland Security is really satisfying. Dang it — a woman in charge of security! Although I can hear it already: Those who despise her for representing Anita Hill during U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearing, along with those who despise her for her gender (juxtaposed with her accomplishments), will have a rip-roaring time delineating various imagined security shortcomings they believe inherent in her body parts and apparel. Tucker Carlson, Marc Rudov, Mort Kondracke, Sean Hannity, Chris Matthews, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly all come to mind, with their penchant for misogyny posing as punditry.

Napolitano, Clinton and all other female nominees had best gird their loins for the onslaught of PMS, nagging wives, witches and bitches, cosmetics, cleavage, vaginas, aging and ball-buster slurs masquerading as political commentary.

I know it would be equally unprofessional and sophomoric, but what a lesson for those boys (and the girls who try to win by foolishly playing their game), were they to be similarly critiqued for their prostate problems, midlife crisis acquisitions, erectile dysfunction, increasingly hairy ears, comb-overs, male hair dye, androgen deficiencies and those little dribble spots on the crotches of their designer slacks. Think I’m being mean? Check out the video compilation by the Women’s Media Center.

Chicago businesswoman Penny Pritzker escaped the sexist critique: Although her name was briefly floated for Secretary of Commerce, it dropped like a sinner to her knees. She was quite successful as Obama’s national campaign finance chair, but she withdrew her own name from cabinet consideration — perhaps due to her historical subprime lending involvement.

Still in the running for targets of pundit prurience are Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius, one of a multitude of pro-choice Catholics I’d like to point out to Father Jay Scott Newman, and economist and professor Laura D’Andrea Tyson, President Bill Clinton’s chair of the Council of Economic Advisers (the first female in that position). They are both on media shortlists for a variety of cabinet nominations yet to be claimed.

And then there’s … um, ah … hmmm, either a dearth of leaks or a dearth of women in contention for Obama cabinet posts. If the mass inside the Beltway were not so prone to verbal vomitus, we could believe the lack of names of additional women being seriously considered is a failure to disgorge. Sadly, that’s a tough one to swallow.

palinbarbarians2So, while we wait, perhaps fruitlessly, for additional female nominees’ names to leak forth, I’d like to get back to Alaska’s Governor Palin for a moment. Because we’re in nomination mode and because Palin is in “What’s next for me?” mode and because she apparently doesn’t read much and, hence, is unlikely to read this, how about congressional Republicans create a special position just for a Palin nomination, that of Minority Mascot? It puts her safely out of the running for president (I could find nary a mascot who succeeded a team leader); it will save the Republican Party from untold embarrassment; it panders to those who take Palin seriously; it feeds her craving for on-camera face time, as long as she declines the mascot head gear; and it gives the William Morris Agency, one of her suitors, a nice opportunity to gauge her ability to speak extemporaneously.

Extemporaneously, that’s like when the speaking of things that is, which people who love this great country of ours, when they are finding themself wanting to hear the hopefulness that we all hope to feel also, is the way to say those things of importance that which they hope to hear, there, without a teleprompter. Yeah, OK!

I’m sure the other nominees will know what it is.

Love,
K-B

©2008 Kit-Bacon Gressitt

(Photos by Theresa Thompson and smitemeFlickr, using a Creative Commons license.)

Comments (8)

C.November 24th, 2008 at 9:41 am

GREAT article -sent this to my daughters and all my women friends
Thanks for spreading the word – the video was totally appalling and enraging and I had not seen it before.
C.

DougNovember 24th, 2008 at 9:43 am

I share your hope that Obama will favor us with a diverse richness of leadership talent for his cabinet.
But only a few positions have been named (or leaked), with many more yet to come.
I think it judicious to withhold overly pessmistic judgment until the actual results are in.

JNovember 24th, 2008 at 9:43 am

Well, they appear to be at DHS and State so far. As well as his senior, long-term, and most trusted policy advisor.
Also, the Ex Director of Emily’s List, while as gender challenged as I am, should probably be viewed as gender neutral at least.

SalNovember 24th, 2008 at 9:45 am

I loved this post!

AnonNovember 24th, 2008 at 9:46 am

K-B – they are where women always are – NOT THERE – though I am pleased to see Hillary despite her baggage. She is the best choice of those offered for that position. This election was the total disenfranchisement of women – especially educated women – John McCain even had the audacity to say women would get ahead if they had education. Well I have education and still make more than 40K less than less well educated men in the same position in the same area. Well with that off my chest – gee hope you have a nice day :)

RickNovember 24th, 2008 at 9:48 am

Hillary Clinton has the influence of at least 3-5 normal cabinet member. Janet Napolitano is also a major force,no? I believe Obama is about as good as any man can get on the subject. … When I can come up with, say, 4 out of 10, my wife needs to remind me that 40% is not 100%.

JackNovember 25th, 2008 at 9:42 am

Hillary can count for at least 5 females. Judge by the importance of the position not just bodies. She’s more important in my opinion than the Veep.

Jennifer De La CruzNovember 25th, 2008 at 10:48 pm

I would be thrilled to see Sen. Hillary Clinton as the next secretary of state. And as for a woman in charge of security, I have never met anyone better at it than my sister, a former chief of police.

Leave a comment

Your comment